Forum on Article 112 banned at Mahasarakham University
The College of Politics and Governance of Mahasarakham University has refused permission to a group of students to hold a public forum to discuss Article 112 on its premises, citing concerns of possible violent conflict.
A group of students planned to hold a public forum on ‘Rights and Freedoms in a Democracy under the Lèse Majesté Law’ on 1 Feb, and asked the college for permission to use a room in one of its buildings for the forum, but their request was denied by the Dean of the College.
On 31 Jan, the students launched a campaign collecting signatures of students, alumni and other people to demand an explanation from the college.
In response, College Dean Assoc Prof Sida Sonsri released a statement to the media explaining the decision to refuse permission, saying that the college’s administrators, in consideration of the increasing conflicts of ideas in society, were concerned that they would not be able to deal with any violence that might occur on the college’s premises if the activity was allowed to happen.
The college does not suppress academic freedom, but needs to maintain its neutrality because students and staff at the college include those who have differing views on the lèse majesté issue, she said.
She asked the students to hold the forum at a more proper place where ‘diverse views can be expressed with no risk of violence, which is unforeseeable due to conflicts on such a sensitive issue. This may lead to damage to public property and, more importantly, affect the unity of students and staff in the overall image of the College.’
On 2 Feb, a group of students held a protest at the college, holding banners and reading a statement against the Dean’s decision and explanation under the watchful eye of the administrative authorities and police.



While they were protesting, another group of students also held banners to defend the College and support the Dean, claiming that ‘students do not want the forum to be held because it is a sensitive issue.’
Sida and other College administrators came out to meet the protesters, saying that they had not restricted academic freedom and asking them to reread her statement. She then gave flowers to the protesters.


'We don't want a wreath.' :College supporting students
The protesters decided not to lay a wreath in protest as had been planned for fear of clashes with the College’s supporters, and instead distributed information to other students and people instead.



Comments
This is one of the bogus
This is one of the bogus academic communities in Thailand. It's actually no more than a fraternity/sorority - a hazing operation which grants admission to the very lowest levels of the 'elite' to applicants upon 'successful' hazing completion.
Anyone who voluntarily accedes to their own humiliation and degradation is deemed proper material, deemed to have proven their ability and desire to work against their own interests in support of the 'elite', in favor of their own perpetual degradation and that of their successors, and for the perpetuation of rule by a privileged minority in Thailand.
What is COPAG as in the
What is COPAG as in the posters in the photo proclaiming "We (heart) COPAG"?
Could anyone tell me?
Tom, COPAG stands for
Tom, COPAG stands for "College of Politics and Governance" - it is a college of Mahasarakham University.
The violence that is
The violence that is threatened comes exclusively from one side of the argument. Those that wanted to hold the public forum are the victims of intimidation, threats and potential violence.
When the dean refuses to allow this forum because he claims to wants to remain neutral it is a lie.
He has succumbed to the threats and thereby affirms the right of those carrying out the threats to continue to do so.
As he himself has shown his own (in part understandable) fear he should at least have the courage to say so and not hide behind a non-existent claim of "neutrality" which whitewashes those that threaten violence.
Nor is it a letter from the international community's "intellectuals" that will make as much as a dent in the hardline wall of arrogance bolstered by oppression of those that would quash anyone who dares speak up. The governments and European monarchies must themselves be held accountable for their silence and forced also to show which stance they take. To paraphrase a well-know cliche "you can not have your steak and eat it too".
Only when the governments and constitutional monarchies of Europe pressure Thailand will meaningful change of article 112 ever be possible.
Those are very professionally
Those are very professionally made "I love COPAG" signs that the pro-college students are displaying; not something I would expect real college students on a tight budget would have prepared in advance. I smell a strategically staged counter protest by right wing University admins.