The content in this page ("Witness insists director guilty" by Pravit Rojanaphruk, The Nation) is not produced by Prachatai staff. Prachatai merely provides a platform, and the opinions stated here do not necessarily reflect those of Prachatai.

Witness insists director guilty

Prosecution witness Pol Lieutenant Boonlert Kalayanamitr told the court yesterday that director Chiranuch Premchaiporn had indeed committed a crime by not removing alleged lese majeste remarks posted by others on the site's bulletin board.

"We notified [Chiranuch] about the comments found on the website, and this is already an offence" under the Computer Crimes Act, Boonlert, the last witness from the prosecution side, told the two presiding judges. He added that the 10 "defamatory remarks" were visible on for 11 days.

Boonlert, who led the police investigation team, said Chiranuch was "very cooperative" when she was asked for the IP addresses of the people who anonymously posted the messages. Only one user's IP address was tracked down and police could not trace the rest because Internet shops only retain the information of users for a maximum of 90 days.

The single IP address found was traced to Jiraphan Charoenphon, who was acquitted by the court because there was no evidence that she had used the computer, which was in her parents' factory and could be accessed by others.

After testifying in court, Boonlert told reporters that there were many cases still being pursued, but wanted the subject dropped, "because giving interviews will affect the security and the Crown. It's dangerous."

Chiranuch faces 20 years in prison if found guilty.

Sarinee Achavanuntakul, a key member of the Thai Netizen Network (TNN) who observed the hearing yesterday, said the ruling would likely be based on the role and responsibility of an intermediary - Chiranuch in this case - which would then be interpreted under the Computer Crimes Act's Article 15.

When asked if not removing the posts quickly enough was tantamount to consent, Sarinee said: "It's still a point of contention as to what constitutes consent."

She added that further crackdowns on lese majeste offenders would likely continue, especially "under a climate where all [political groups] are competing to become more royalist than others. It's tough."

However, Sarinee defended Chiranuch for being cooperative and said she had no choice but to provide any and all information she had about the anonymous posters.

"The law does not give much leeway and is very obscure," Sarinee said, adding that Chiranuch was "legally obliged" even if she disagreed with the law.



Since 2007, Prachatai English has been covering underreported issues in Thailand, especially about democratization and human rights, despite the risk and pressure from the law and the authorities. However, with only 2 full-time reporters and increasing annual operating costs, keeping our work going is a challenge. Your support will ensure we stay a professional media source and be able to expand our team to meet the challenges and deliver timely and in-depth reporting.

• Simple steps to support Prachatai English

1. Bank transfer to account “โครงการหนังสือพิมพ์อินเทอร์เน็ต ประชาไท” or “Prachatai Online Newspaper” 091-0-21689-4, Krungthai Bank

2. Or, Transfer money via Paypal, to e-mail address:, please leave a comment on the transaction as “For Prachatai English”